|
March 17 2011
Superintendent
Yagielski presents first budget draft
District faces $9.6 million gap
Superintendent
John Yagielski presented the first draft of the Schenectady City
School District 2011-12 Budget to the board of education
Wednesday evening. Yagielski outlined a baseline expenditure
budget, reviewed revenue projections and discussed his plans to
tackle the challenges of balancing a budget.
“We are facing
unusually difficult times,” said Yagielski regarding what is
ahead in the budget process. But the superintendent assured the
board of education that the fine details of the budget will be
fully disclosed, presented publically and available. "The entire
process will be transparent," said Yagielski. The school
district is facing a $9.6 million gap despite crafting a
budget that is less than the current year. This is the
result of a significant decrease in revenue. Yagielski
said the district will not be turning to the taxpayers to make
up the difference. “This community does not have tolerance for
a tax increase,” he said.
Yagielski built
the baseline budget from scratch (zero-base). “I did not use
the current budget as a starting point,” said Yagielski. “I
started with a blank piece of paper.”
Expenditures
Yagielski said he
went through every account line by line, examined and squeezed
as much from the budget as possible without eliminating any
programs or positions. In the end, the superintendent produced
a draft budget package of $159,200,397, which reflects a savings
of more than $6 million and one that is $1.5 million less than
the 2010-2011 budget.
[Link to “First
Draft Budget]
The reduced budget includes contractual increases and all
current staff positions with the exception of the assistant
superintendent positions which are abolished effective June 30,
2011.
General Fund
Baseline Budget Summary
|
Year |
Total |
K-12
Enrollment |
Budget
per Enrollment |
|
2011-12 Budget |
$159,200,397 |
9,715 |
$16,387 |
|
2010-11 Budget |
$160,708,288 |
9,704 |
$16,561 |
|
Difference |
($1,507,891)
(.9%) |
11 |
($174)
(1.1%) |
Note: In
addition to K-12 enrollments, we have responsibilities for
many other students including Pre-K, Special Education
students in public and private placements, foster placement
and resident students attending charter and private schools.
The budget also
includes “very limited additions.” Yagielski proposes:
-
that the
district provide transportation to students who have been
suspended and assigned to the tutoring program held at
Washington Irving Adult Education Center.
$90,000
-
implementing
an “In-Residency” pilot program at the elementary level.
Two teachers holding administrative certification would
serve administrative residency among three elementary
schools. $46,000
“About 40 teachers hold administration certification,” said
Yagielski. “This would give them live administrative
experience, growth opportunity and provide principals with
some degree of relief so they can focus on teachers,
classrooms and teaching and learning.”
-
adding
academic area curriculum leaders at the middle schools.
$15,000
-
adding
academic department chairs at the high school. $108,000.
“We need to
supplement what we do with coordinators and add in-level support
at the secondary level,” said Yagielski.
The key cost
drivers in the budget are salary and benefits for current staff
members and employer contributions to the retirement system.
Also, last year the district adopted the retirement incentive.
The first installment of $229,00 is due to come out of the
2011-12 budget.
[Link to “First
Draft Budget]
[Link to
First Draft Budget by
Expenditure Type]
Revenues
The $9.6 million
budget shortfall results from a shortage of revenue. Yagielski
presented a chart
[Link to
Revenues Chart]
that outlined the current as well as next year’s revenue
stream. Revenues are expected to total $146,391,803 in
2011-12.
“Look at this ‘GAP
Elimination' figure ($9,956,628),” said Yagielski. “It’s almost
$10 million.” The GAP elimination is an additional amount the
district should expect to get according to state aid formula but
won't get because the funds are being withheld to offset New
York State’s budget challenges. “If we were getting that
money, by design of the formula, we’d be having a much different
conversation right now,” said Yagielski. “We’d be whistling a
happy song. But, unfortunately, we are not whistling a happy
song.”
A tax base reduced
by $1.3 million will also adversely affect the school district’s
revenue total.
By starting with a
zero base budget and squeezing funds, Yagielski said the
district will save about $3 million from the current year
budget. The district would have roughly $6.2 million in fund
balance. Yagielski’s first budget draft proposes utilizing
$3,150,000 in the new budget.
“I normally would
suggest spreading the fund balance over three years,” said
Yagielski. “I’m going against what I would usually do here.
Only because the situation calls for it.”
The Challenge
of Balancing the Budget
[Link to Chart:
Challenge of Balancing
the Budget]
“We face a very
serious financial problem,” said Yagielski. “We must reduce
overall costs not just next year but beyond.” The
superintendent said he does not see the ‘gap elimination’ going
away. “We have to down size and not lose sight of why we are
here.”
Yagielski
reiterated that throughout the process, the district cannot lose
sight of the need to keep moving forward and to keep the focus
on student achievement. “We have to look for opportunities to
improve teaching and learning,” he said.
Moving ahead,
Yagielski said he will identify alternatives and less costly
ways of operating. “Adjusting to new structure is not only
challenging, it’s painful, because we are a people business,” he
said. “We must look at changes that will help us not just next
year, but far down the road."
“I can’t think of
a cut that won’t have significant impact,” he said. “We have to
look closely at determine what things are working right now.”
He also plans to identify permanent changes that might take time
to develop and implement. “We are interested in creating
programs that respond to needs,” said Yagielski.
Examples of
Potential Alternatives include:
-
Establish
programs to bring students who are currently attending BOCES
programs back to the district
-
Hire district
staff to perform various itinerant services currently
provided by BOCES
-
Accelerate the
change from the AIS model to a model emphasizing earlier
intervention
-
Explore
modification to school day schedules
-
Suspend
current policies and practices related to transportation and
staff development
Yagielski is
making a “budget book” with various levels of detail including
program summaries and descriptions available to the public. The
book will be available for review in the district office,
Schenectady High School library and four public libraries. The
final budget book will be accessible from the district website.
“I want this
process to be as transparent as possible and for people to
easily get any information they need,” said Yagielski.
Schedule of
Budget Sessions
March 23
Present and discuss specific less costly alternative ways of
operating
March 30
Present and discuss a multi-year plan for the use of fund
balance, including reserve accounts as well as an initial list
of other budget reductions
April 6
Present and discuss budget reductions needed to balance the
budget
April 14
Final selection of alternatives and budget reductions
April 20
Board of Education adopts 2011-12 Budget
“I’m committed to
making the process as calm, rational and orderly as possible,”
said Yagielski. “I need the help of everyone. Let’s keep our
eyes on the target and strengthen the district for years ahead.”
Back
|